Back

Differential impact of FLASH and conventional radiotherapy on a pivotal metabolic organ: White Adipose Tissue

Scabia, G.; Furini, G.; Usai, A.; Asero, G.; Guerra, E.; Mota da Silva, E.; Kusmic, C.; Cavalieri, A.; Del Sarto, D.; Costa, M.; Wabitsch, M.; Rossi, F.; Di Pietro, R.; Lattanzio, S.; Luca, T.; Pezzino, S.; Castorina, S.; Cusano, R.; Capaccioli, S.; Gonnelli, A.; Paiar, F.; Di Martino, F.; Cinti, S.; Maffei, M.

2026-04-01 physiology
10.64898/2026.03.30.715260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDSubcutaneous white adipose tissue (scWAT), a key metabolic and endocrine organ, is inevitably exposed during radiotherapy (RT). While RT is a cornerstone of cancer treatment, its efficacy is limited by toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) RT has emerged as a promising modality capable of preserving tumor control while reducing normal tissue damage - the so-called FLASH effect. Clinical evidence indicates that childhood exposure to conventional (CONV) RT is associated with long-term dysmetabolism and WAT dysfunction. However, the impact of FLASH-RT on WAT has not been investigated. AIMTo compare the effects of FLASH- and CONV-RT on adipocyte function and scWAT homeostasis, and to identify molecular and structural changes associated with each modality. METHODSWe evaluated the effects of FLASH- and CONV-RT on adipocytes and scWAT using a dedicated linear accelerator capable of delivering both modalities. Experiments were performed in the human SGBS preadipocyte/adipocyte cell line and in a mouse model subjected to proximal hind limb irradiation, with analyses conducted 70 days post-exposure. RESULTSRT impaired adipogenic differentiation in a dose-dependent manner, with a relative sparing effect of FLASH at 4-8 Gy. Mature adipocytes exhibited radioresistance, with protection by FLASH at 8 Gy. In vivo, both regimens reduced fat mass without affecting body weight, with greater loss following CONV-RT. Transcriptomic profiling of scWAT revealed inflammatory and neurodegenerative signatures after CONV-RT, whereas FLASH-RT induced minimal transcriptional changes. Histological and ultrastructural analyses confirmed increased cellular damage, vacuolization, lipid spill-over, and reduced PLIN1 expression, predominantly in CONV-treated mice. CONCLUSIONSWAT homeostasis is sensitive to conventional RT, whereas FLASH-RT better preserves tissue structure and function, with implications for long-term metabolic health in cancer survivors.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.1%
3
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
5.1%
6
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
12
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
16
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
20
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%