Back

Positional cues, not Notch, direct Neuroblast selection during early neurogenesis in the Drosophila embryo

Green, D.; Mazouni, K.; Nos, M.; Schweisguth, F.

2026-04-01 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.03.30.715196 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Notch-mediated lateral inhibition is a conserved patterning process that controls alternative cell fate decisions and produces regular cell fate patterns. Prevailing models posit that lateral inhibition singles-out cells from fields of initially equipotent cells by amplifying stochastic fluctuations of Notch or pre-existing fate biases. Here, we revisited the role of Notch in early Drosophila neurogenesis, studying the dynamics of Neuroblast specification by live imaging the transcription of two proneural genes, scute and lethal of scute. We found that proneural gene expression is biased spatially along the dorsal-ventral axis prior to germ band extension and that early proneural expression predicts Neuroblast fate acquisition. This indicated that Neuroblast specification is pre-patterned by positional cues. Additionally, positional cues appeared to instruct individual cells to delaminate in a correct stereotyped pattern in proneural mutant embryos. Finally, contrary to current models, Notch signaling, measured by E(spl)m8 expression, was not detectable within proneural clusters until after Neuroblasts had initiated delamination. This indicated that Notch functions to stabilize rather than initiate fate decisions. We therefore propose that positional cues, not Notch, single-out Neuroblasts during early Drosophila neurogenesis, challenging long-held assumptions about the role of Notch in Neuroblast selection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.3%
2
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
4
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
14
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
16
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.5%
19
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%