Back

The Speciation Continuum in Bloom: Incomplete Lineage Sorting, Gene Flow, and Reticulate Evolution in Rapidly Diverging Plant Lineages

Soares, L. S.; Fagundes, N. R.; Bombarely, A.; Freitas, L. B.

2026-04-01 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.30.715067 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The remarkable diversity of life on Earth results from evolutionary processes functioning across different spatial and temporal scales. Species diversification occurs through various mechanisms and at widely varying rates, but identifying the conditions that trigger bursts of diversification over short timescales remains a central challenge in evolutionary biology. This difficulty is more pronounced when incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), hybridization, and ongoing gene flow obscure evolutionary relationships and complicate species delimitation. In this study, we investigated the evolutionary history and species boundaries within a group of recently diverged Petunia lineages shaped by pervasive gene flow. We integrated phylogenomic, population genetic, and species delimitation approaches to reconstruct lineage relationships and assess whether these lineages represent distinct species or stages along a speciation continuum. By applying methods that account for both ILS and gene flow, we revealed that most lineages are not fully independent evolutionary units but rather occupy intermediate positions along this continuum. Gene flow played a crucial role during diversification, blurring species boundaries and generating reticulate evolutionary patterns. Our findings demonstrate that traditional phylogenetic trees may oversimplify relationships in such systems, while phylogenetic networks offer a more accurate representation of evolutionary history. Comprehensive and integrative analyses, such as those employed here, are essential for capturing these complex dynamics. Ultimately, only four lineages could be confidently recognized as distinct species, whereas the remaining represent cases of ongoing divergence. These results emphasize the need to refine species delimitation frameworks for systems characterized by recent divergence and extensive reticulation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.6%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.2%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
9
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
14
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
16
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
19
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%