Back

Platelets Outperform Leukocytes in Transcriptomic Liquid Biopsy Profiling of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Shen, Z.; Sawalkar, A.; Wu, J.; Natu, V.; Rowley, J.; T. Rondina, M.; Krishnan, A.

2026-04-01 pathology
10.64898/2026.03.30.714941 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by progressive myelofibrosis that drives morbidity and mortality. Liquid biopsy approaches to noninvasively monitor fibrotic progression remain limited. We performed comparative transcriptomic profiling of CD45-depleted platelet-enriched and CD45+ leukocyte-enriched fractions from matched peripheral blood samples of 76 individuals (27 primary myelofibrosis, 17 polycythemia vera, 14 essential thrombocythemia, 18 healthy controls). Platelet RNA sequencing was performed in 2018-2020 on Illumina HiSeq 4000, while WBC RNA sequencing was conducted in 2023 on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 from cryopreserved CD45+ enriched fractions of specimens obtained at the identical time and from the same blood sample as the platelet RNA. Despite comparable library preparation protocols and higher sequencing depth in WBC samples, platelet transcriptomes exhibited 5.1-fold more differential expression in myelofibrosis (3,453 versus 681 genes, adjusted p<0.05, |log2FC|>1). Platelet signatures were enriched for proteostasis pathways including endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response, reflecting megakaryocyte dysfunction in the fibrotic bone marrow niche. WBC signatures predominantly featured immune activation and proliferative pathways, indicating systemic inflammatory responses. Multinomial LASSO classification demonstrated superior performance of platelet-based models for myelofibrosis diagnosis (AUROC 0.85) compared to WBC-based (AUROC 0.77) or clinical models (AUROC 0.59). Combined platelet+WBC models did not improve performance (AUROC 0.80), indicating complementary but non-additive information. These findings establish platelet transcriptomic profiling as a superior noninvasive biomarker platform for monitoring myelofibrosis in MPNs, capturing megakaryocyte-driven fibrogenesis with greater sensitivity than peripheral leukocyte-based approaches. HighlightsUsing matched WBC and platelet RNA-seq from MPN patients, we identify myelofibrosis-associated transcriptomic signatures specifically enriched in platelets. Multinomial LASSO modeling highlights platelet-derived gene expression as a dominant and predictive biomarker of myelofibrosis, outperforming clinical parameters and WBC signatures. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=75 SRC="FIGDIR/small/714941v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d695aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fc250forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e52e8eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15378e3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.5%
2
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
3
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
4
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
5
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.5%
8
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
9
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
12
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
29
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%