Determinants of metal import and specificity in a bacterial transporter
Berry, S. P.; Freedman, C. B.; Marks, D. S.; Gaudet, R.
Show abstract
Membrane transporters have evolved finely tuned substrate specificity within a limited repertoire of structural superfamilies, but the biophysical origins of transporter specificity remain unclear. We have systematically investigated the determinants of import and specificity in the model Deinococcus radiodurans (Dra)Nramp metal importer by testing targeted structure- and evolution-guided libraries of sequence variants in new high-throughput assays for import of the native substrate Mn2+ and the chemically similar but excluded metal Mg2+. The effects of most combinatorial mutations on Mn2+ import fit a simple global epistasis model, but many additional unexplained long-range epistatic interactions cluster at a set of structural hotspots at the inner and outer vestibules of the transporter. By contrast, mutations enabling Mg2+ import have non-additive effects and generally fall into two categories: a few core specificity positions in the first two shells around the metal are sufficient to allow DraNramp to import Mg2+, and additional modulator mutations can finetune specificity when combined with core-position mutations. The modulator mutations overlap considerably with key epistatic mutations, and we use this insight to propose a new biochemical model for how mutations that alter conformational balance in transporters can lead both to long-range epistasis and specificity modulation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanism of NanR gene repression and allosteric induction of bacterial sialic acid metabolism 98%
- Frequent transitions in self-assembly across the evolution of a central metabolic enzyme 98%
- Structures of the multi-domain oxygen sensor DosP: remote control of a c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase by a regulatory PAS domain 98%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.