Back

Reversibility of Cognitive Effects Associated with Concomitant Gabapentin and Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Use

Green, J.; Fonseca, L. M.; Simon, S. S.; Schnaider Beeri, M.; Tafuto, B.; Byham-Gray, L. D.; Kaplan, J.

2026-04-01 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.03.30.26349787 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Gabapentin prescriptions have increased 123% since 2010, reaching 59 million annually and 15.5 million patients. Recent evidence indicates that concomitant use of gabapentin and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCBs) amplifies dementia risk through a dual neuronal calcium signaling blockade mechanism. Whether these cognitive effects are reversible upon discontinuation, and whether the combination accelerates decline in patients with established dementia, remains unknown. Methods: We conducted two complementary studies using the Rutgers Clinical Research Data Warehouse (CRDW; 2015-2024). Study 1: A self-controlled case series (SCCS; N=3,058) comparing cognitive event rates during concomitant gabapentin-DHP-CCB use versus after discontinuation, using strictly duration-matched observation windows. Study 2: A cohort study (N=320) of patients with established dementia initiating gabapentin, comparing outcomes between DHP-CCB, non-DHP-CCB, and no-CCB users. Findings were externally replicated in the NIH All of Us Research Program Controlled Tier (N=8,853). Results: In the CRDW self-controlled analysis, event rates were significantly higher during combination use versus after discontinuation: falls (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11-1.61), cognitive symptoms (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.38-2.01), and composite cognitive endpoint (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.59). Effects were greatest when both drugs were discontinued (cognitive symptoms RR 2.21; falls RR 1.76). Protopathic bias was ruled out by monotonically increasing RRs across 0-, 30-, and 60-day lag conditions. In the dementia acceleration cohort, DHP-CCB use tripled encephalopathy risk (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.36-7.46), with zero events among non-DHP CCB users. External replication in All of Us confirmed all primary outcomes (falls RR 1.53, cognitive symptoms RR 1.26, composite RR 1.42; all p<0.001). A non-DHP CCB negative control in All of Us confirmed mechanistic specificity: cognitive symptom and encephalopathy reversal signals were absent with verapamil/diltiazem. CKD amplified effects in both datasets, consistent with gabapentin accumulation through impaired renal clearance. Conclusions: Cognitive effects associated with concomitant gabapentin-DHP-CCB use appear substantially reversible upon discontinuation, replicated across two independent datasets. The DHP-specific pattern, confirmed through a pharmacological negative control, supports a neuronal L-type calcium channel mechanism. Clinicians should review gabapentin-DHP-CCB combinations in patients with cognitive complaints or falls, as deprescribing - particularly of both agents - may produce meaningful improvement.

Matching journals

The top 17 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.7%
2
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.8%
5
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
17
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
18
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
20
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
24
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
25
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
28
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
29
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
30
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%