Back

Twenty-five years of monitoring reveals that uninterrupted rodent control is the fundamental driver of breeding success in the Galapagos Petrel Pterodroma phaeopygia

Lopes, F.; Gibbs, J. P.; Carrion, J.

2026-03-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.29.715149 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The long-standing misconception that the Galapagos petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia) and the Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis) were conspecific masked the severe vulnerability of the Galapagos population. By the time its distinct status was recognized, the Galapagos petrel was already in marked decline, primarily due to invasive predators. Consequently, sustained rodent control programs have been implemented on Santa Cruz Island. An unintentional one-year failure in rodent control provided a rare quasi-experimental opportunity to quantify the demographic consequences of the invasive black rat predator. During this year, hatching success declined by [~]35% and breeding success by [~]40% relative to long-term means (66% and 62%, respectively), representing a substantial reproductive collapse. Fledging success exhibited a comparatively modest decline (from a long-term mean of 94% to 86% in 2017), suggesting stage-specific vulnerability. These results support the hypothesis that invasive black rats primarily affect early reproductive stages through egg predation and predation on small chicks, while older chicks surpass a critical size threshold that reduces susceptibility. Across the remaining managed years, reproductive metrics exhibited great stability, demonstrating the petrels resilience against other environmental or climatic stressors. Our findings provide robust empirical evidence that invasive rodent control is the dominant driver of reproductive success in this endangered seabird. The quasi-experimental failure underscored both the effectiveness and the necessity of continuous predator management, highlighting the severe and immediate consequences of even short-term lapses.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.2%
4
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
6
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
12
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
21
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%