Back

Novel but stable endosymbionts have contrasting effects on aphid dispersal and plant feeding damage in the cereal pest Diuraphis noxia

Gu, X.; Gill, A.; Yang, Q.; Ross, P.; Hayward, L.; Stelmach, M.; Umina, P. A.; Doomun, S. N. E.; Berran, M.; Coakley, L.; Sharma, S.; Hoffman, A.

2026-03-30 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.29.715140 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Endosymbiotic bacteria can affect many ecological attributes of their insect hosts, including (in herbivorous insects) how insects interact with plants where they feed. This raises the issue of whether deliberate endosymbiont introductions could be used to decrease crop damage caused by insect pests. Here we investigate how transinfecting Rickettsiella viridis and Regiella insecticola endosymbionts into a novel pest aphid host, the Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia), influences population growth, alate production, dispersal ability and crop damage. Both the Rickettsiella (originating from pea aphids) and Regiella (from green peach aphids) were stably maintained in their new host where they had contrasting effects. Rickettsiella increased the severity of aphid damage on wheat and barley, resulting in greater leaf loss, chlorotic streaking, and higher aphid populations, whereas Regiella reduced aphid population growth and the severity of feeding damage by aphids. Their effects on dispersal morphology also differed: Regiella had no detectable impact on alate incidence, while Rickettsiella consistently suppressed wing formation in small cages, and in larger mesocosms with multiple wheat plants this endosymbiont suppressed dispersal. Endosymbiont-mediated changes in feeding damage did not involve the main plant immune response pathways: transinfected and wild type aphids induced similar levels of jasmonic acid, jasmonic acid-isoleucine, and salicylic acid in plant tissues, even though these plant defenses were strongly activated during aphid feeding. Novel endosymbionts can therefore modulate the severity of plant feeding damage by aphids as well as influencing aphid dispersal. Potential applications in controlling pest D. noxia populations are discussed. Significance statementEndosymbiotic bacteria that live within insect cells can have wide-ranging effects on the reproduction and fitness of their insect hosts in different environments. In herbivorous insects this includes effects on host plant use. Here we test if novel endosymbionts in a pest aphid, the Russian wheat aphid, might be used to decrease crop damage and dispersal. We show that the damage caused to wheat and barley plants from aphid feeding is modulated by novel but stably transmitted introduced endosymbionts. One endosymbiont (Rickettsiella) increased the severity of damage but decreased aphid dispersal, while another (Regiella) decreased damage severity without impacting dispersal. These contrasting effects may be associated with changes in aphid population growth and wing formation but were not linked to key plant immune response pathways. We discuss implications of these findings for using endosymbionts in agricultural pest management. Classification: Applied Biological Sciences, microbiology

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
25.9%
2
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
5
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
12
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
18
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
29
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%