Back

Protocol-dependent cardiomyocyte states determine disease modelling capacity of human iPSCs

Shen, S.; Tan, C.; Cao, Y.; Chow, C. S. Y.; Mizikovsky, D.; Reid, J.; Dingwall, S.; Prowse, A.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Z.; Negi, S.; Bao, S. C.; Sinniah, E.; Shim, W. J.; Zhao, Q.; Thorpe, J.; Zahabi, A.; Hanna, A.; Cheng, T.; Hill, A.; Hudson, J. E.; Chong, J. J. H.; Palpant, N. J.

2026-03-31 systems biology
10.64898/2026.03.29.715135 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) are widely used to model cardiovascular disease, yet numerous differentiation protocols generate cardiomyocytes with heterogeneous molecular and functional properties, complicating experimental design. Here we systematically compare sixteen commonly used cardiomyocyte differentiation protocols and characterize their resulting cell states using single-nucleus RNA sequencing, functional phenotyping and computational integration with human genetic data. Despite similar cardiomyocyte yields, protocols produced distinct transcriptional programs, subtype compositions and physiological properties. By integrating protocol-specific gene expression signatures with genome-wide association studies of cardiovascular traits, we identify cardiomyocyte states enriched for genetic architectures underlying specific diseases. These analyses accurately predict protocols most suitable for modelling particular disease contexts, including electrophysiological defects associated with Brugada syndrome and metabolic vulnerability relevant to myocardial infarction. Our results demonstrate that differentiation protocols encode biologically distinct cardiomyocyte states with differential disease relevance and establish a framework for aligning stem-cell differentiation strategies with human complex trait genetics to guide model selection. This approach enables rational design of iPSC-based disease models and highlights how population-scale genetic data can inform experimental systems in stem cell biology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.0%
4
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.0%
8
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
10
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
14
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
21
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
24
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
25
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
27
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%