Back

Personalized microbiotas (counter-)select for antibiotic resistant strains

Knopp, M.; Garcia-Santamarina, S.; Michel, L.; Papagiannidis, D.; David, S.; Selegato, D. M.; Wong, J. L. C.; Karcher, N.; Frankel, G.; Zimmermann, M.; Savitski, M.; Typas, A.

2026-03-30 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.29.715108 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antibiotic resistant pathogens are an increasing public health threat, as development of novel therapeutics is outpaced by resistance emergence and dissemination. Approaches to slow down or even revert antibiotic resistance are necessary to maintain efficacy of both existing and new antibiotics. Such approaches exploit the fitness cost of resistance elements, but have largely relied on assessing this cost in laboratory conditions that poorly reflect the native context in which pathogens reside. Here we present a method that allows to investigate the influence of personalized human gut microbiota compositions on the competitive fitness of antibiotic resistant pathogens. Using fecal matter-derived microbiomes we identify a specific community that selects for a carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain. This selective advantage is due to mutations arising in a LacI-type transcriptional regulator, GlyR. We show that upregulation of the downstream glycoporin GlyP is causing the effect. By deconvoluting the microbiome composition, we identify a focal E. coli strain as a central driver of the selection, which is further modulated by other microbiota members. We demonstrate that the selective advantage is due to carbohydrate competition, and in particular for glycerol-containing compounds. Importantly, glyR mutations are under strong positive but conditional selection in clinical K. pneumoniae isolates. This implies a reduced competitiveness in other environments, which we experimentally validate in vitro. Overall, this study offers a path to identify microbiome-specific interactions that modulate the competitiveness of antibiotic resistant pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.8%
3
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.7%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
10
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.0%
13
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
23
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
27
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
29
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.6%