Back

Beyond abstract selection coefficients: Protandry impacts the buildup of heterozygote advantage over the lifespan in a color polymorphic moth

Selenius, E.; Keaney, T.; Winters, S.; Mappes, J.; Kokko, H.

2026-03-31 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.29.715091 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Population genetic models excel at identifying the conditions for polymorphisms based on balancing selection but typically disregard the ecological processes that yield particular values of selection coefficients. We model a system that combines antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance reversal and heterozygote advantage: the wood tiger moth Arctia plantaginis, where alternative haplotypes at a major-effect locus determine male hindwing coloration. Yellow offers better protection against predators, while white is often associated with better mating success. The effects of mortality and reproductive success overlap in time because protandrous males can mate as long as they are alive, but they need to avoid predation for several days before the bulk of females emerge. We show that protandry aids polymorphism maintenance whenever the second-fittest genotype (after the heterozygote) is the poorly surviving but mating advantaged homozygote, while increased protandry harms polymorphism when the second-best fitness is that of the survival advantaged morph. Ecologically plausible protandry times predict that dominance reversal does not have to be strong for polymorphism to be maintained. Our study highlights the importance of timing traits in maintaining polymorphisms in Lepidoptera and showcases the benefits of deriving fitness explicitly in place of abstract selection coefficients that lack temporal components within the life cycle.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.7%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
4
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.0%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.0%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%