Back

A circulating protein signature for predicting severe immune-related adverse events following CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory lymphoma

Irajizad, E.; Fahrmann, J. F.; Katayama, H.; Strati, P.; Nair, R.; Wang, M.; Chihara, D.; Fayad, L.; Ahmed, S.; Iyer, S. P.; Locke, F. L.; Davila, M.; Flowers, C.; Shpall, E.; Neelapu, S.; Hanash, S.; Westin, J.; Jain, M. D.; John, T. M.; Saini, N. Y.

2026-03-31 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.29.26349664 medRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed treatment for relapsed /refractory(r/r) lymphoid malignancies. Yet, these cellular immunotherapies are often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), that pose significant risks to patient safety and limit broader clinical implementation of CAR T-cell therapies. In the current study, we used proteomics technology to establish circulating protein signatures that would predict severe CRS and ICANS in r/r lymphoma patients that subsequently received CAR T-cell therapy. Initial discovery was performed using plasma samples collected preceding CAR T-cell infusion from 39 r/r lymphoma patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center. A 5-marker and 8-marker protein panel was developed for predicting Grade [≥] 2 CRS and ICANS respectively, yielding respective AUCs of 0.85 [95% CI: 0.72-0.98] and 0.91 [95% CI: 0.81-1.00]. Independent testing of the CRS and ICANS panel was performed in a cohort of 59 r/r lymphoma patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center, with resultant AUCs of 0.76 [95% CI: 0.63-0.89] and 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.84] for the CRS and ICANS panel, respectively. Patients were further classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on panel score tertiles. In the combined dataset (MDACC + Moffitt), compared to patients in the low-risk group (reference), patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups were 3.15 [95% CI: 0.92-12.71] and 13.84 [95% CI: 4.21-56.26] more likely to have Grade [≥] 2 CRS, and 1.21 [95% CI: 0.36-4.23] and 8.59 [95% CI: 2.87-29.09] more likely to have Grade [≥]2 ICANS. The protein biomarker panels provide a means to risk stratify patients who are at high risk for developing severe CRS and ICANS, to inform on the need for prophylactic interventions and improve patient outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
3
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
6
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
8
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
16
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
17
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
20
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
27
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%