Back

Paving the way for automated transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: predicting ciliary body arc length from biometric data using a two-sphere eye model

Szabo, A.; Arpadffy-Lovas, T.; Toth-Molnar, E.

2026-03-31 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.03.29.26349517 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose:To improve determination of the treatment area for the personalization of subliminal transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (SL-TSCPC) procedures in glaucoma treatment, we designed a biometry based model of the human eye to find the estimated cilary body (CB) arc length (ECBAL) and the calculated CB distance (CCBD). Methods: We developed a rotationally symmetric modified two-sphere eye model based on axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW). ECBAL and CCBD were calculated for each eye. Fluence was calculated with standardized parameters. Results: Publicly accessible biometric measurements for 24,001 eyes were pooled for analysis. The mean ECBAL was 23.99+-1.8 mm. The correlations of ECBAL with AL and ACD were 0.723 and 0.754 respectively (p < 0.01). The number of eyes with an ECBAL 21.7-22.0 mm was 131 of 24,001 (0.55%). The mean CCBD was 4.21+-0.8 mm. The number of eyes with a CCBD of 3.8 mm was 1,445 of 24,001 (6.02%). Mean fluence was 120.33+-9.0 J/cm2. A mean difference of -8.18+-6.9%, ranging from -22.66% to +29.07% in fluence was observed with treating only the recommended 22 mm versus the ECBAL. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that use of 22.0 mm as the standard treatment arc length may under or overdose laser treatment in many eyes. Precise estimation or exact localization of the CB treatment area is required to accurately calculate fluence. Translational Relevance:The model proves that CB arc length is a variable while current guidelines consider it a constant

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
8
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.8%
20
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%