Back

Charting the landscape of organellar genome evolution in eustigmatophyte algae

Richtar, M.; Klapuchova, E.; Yurchenko, T.; Fawley, K. P.; Fawley, M. W.; Barcyte, D.; Jaske, K.; Wolf, B. M.; Li, F.-W.; Sevcikova, T.; Elias, M.

2026-03-30 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.28.715030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Organellar genomes are both a resource for reconstructing organismal phylogenies and interesting subjects for evolutionary studies. Herein, we focused on the organellar genomes of eustigmatophytes (eustigs), a class of the algal phylum Ochrophyta with a growing biotechnological potential, and massively expanded the existing limited sample by 51 new organellar genomes. Analyses of this large dataset provided a robustly resolved eustig phylogeny and important insights into the evolution of unique features of eustig organellar genomes. Eustig plastomes are rather stable in terms of the gene content and order, with only minor differences stemming from differential gene loss and rare lineage-specific gain. In contrast, eustig mitogenomes vary broadly in their gene order, the content of "accessory" genes, and substitution rates. Notably, the new data illuminated the origin of some of the organellar genes previously deemed eustig-specific. Thus, the plastid gene ycf95 most likely is an extremely divergent version of ycf35, and the mitochondrial genes orfX and orfY evolved, respectively, by rps4 duplication and extreme divergence of rps1 ortholog. Most interestingly, we identified five previously unrecognized orthogroups of mysterious mitochondrial orfs that are patchily distributed across eustigs yet likely evolved in the ancestor of this class. These orfs have no discernible homologs outside eustigmatophytes but are predicted to encode multipass membrane proteins with a soluble C-terminal domain. Finally, our results revise some of the previous conclusions regarding the mitochondrial translation in eustigs and suggest the recruitment of a group of unusual tRNAs for a translation-independent function in the genus Vischeria.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.4%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
3
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
4
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.5%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.7%
12
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
14
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.7%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
20
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
21
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
22
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
24
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
26
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
28
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%