Back

Amphitrophic Listeria monocytogenes causes one-third of invasive listeriosis yet remains undetected by clonal complex-based risk classification

Gamboa, J.

2026-03-31 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.28.715028 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conventional genomic risk classification of Listeria monocytogenes assigns clonal complexes to hypervirulent (CC1, CC2, CC4, CC6) or hypovirulent (CC9, CC121) categories based on population-level frequency ratios, leaving all remaining diversity in an undifferentiated "intermediate" category that carries no defined risk assessment. We analysed 436 genomes from confirmed invasive listeriosis across 19 countries using multi-dimensional genomic profiling of virulence and persistence determinants and demonstrate that this approach systematically misclassifies a major fraction of clinically relevant L. monocytogenes. Amphitrophic lineages -- carrying simultaneous genomic competence for clinical virulence (functional inlA, mean virulence score 52.7 +/- 6.6) and industrial persistence (SSI-1 in 94.1%, mean persistence score 66.8 +/- 11.6) -- constitute 31.0% of invasive disease, within 3.6 percentage points of the established hypervirulent category (34.6%). Of these 135 amphitrophic clinical isolates, 91.1% were classified as "intermediate" under conventional taxonomy. The five principal amphitrophic CCs (CC8, CC7, CC3, CC5, CC88) appear with indistinguishable dual-fitness genotypes in both clinical and food-chain datasets, establishing that the same organisms persist in processing facilities and cause invasive human disease. Decomposition of the species-level virulence-persistence trade-off (rho = -0.523) by trophic strategy reveals it to be a Simpsons paradox: no within-strategy correlation is significantly negative, and the only significant signal is a positive amphitrophic correlation (rho = +0.221, p = 0.010) indicating synergy rather than trade-off. Multi-dimensional profiling increases risk-stratified detection from 32.3% (conventional) to 65.6% of clinical isolates -- a 103% improvement. These findings demonstrate that clonal complex identity alone leaves one-third of clinically significant L. monocytogenes uncharacterised, and that effective One Health genomic surveillance requires simultaneous assessment of virulence and persistence at the isolate level.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
18.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
12
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%