Back

Along-Tract Microstructural Alterations Associated with Stimulant Misuse Localized using Diffusion MRI Tractometry

Nabulsi, L.; Feng, Y.; Chandio, B. Q.; Villalon-Reina, J. E.; Ba Gari, I.; Alibrando, J. D.; Nir, T. M.; Juliano, A. C.; Pancholi, D.; Roundy, G. S.; Canessa, N.; Garza-Villarreal, E. A.; Garavan, H.; Jahanshad, N.; Thompson, P. M.

2026-03-31 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.28.714553 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diffusion brain MRI (dMRI) studies of substance use disorders have reported widespread but modest white matter (WM) microstructural alterations with limited anatomical specificity. Here, we applied segment-wise along-tract 3D tractometry to brain dMRI scans to localize fine-scale WM alterations associated with stimulant misuse using two complementary analytical frameworks: Bundle Analytics (BUAN) and Medial Tractography Analysis (MeTA). We analyzed 3D profiles of widely-used diffusion metrics across 33 major WM bundles in independent cohorts of cocaine (74 cases;58 controls) and amphetamine (22 cases;18 controls) users, testing the statistical associations with brain microstructure of pooled stimulant effects, substance-specific effects, and direct comparisons between stimulant classes. Segment-wise analyses revealed focal differences localized to specific tract segments rather than uniform differences along entire bundles. In pooled stimulant misuse, convergent findings across analysis pipelines were localized to hippocampal pathways and were consistent with altered microstructural organization. Amphetamines misuse showed a broader pattern of segment-wise differences across commissural, projection, and association pathways, involving altered axonal organization. No robust segment-wise differences were detected for cocaine misuse or between stimulant classes. These results show that WM alterations are spatially localized and reproducible across tractometry frameworks, highlighting the value of along-tract 3D mapping for improving anatomical specificity in addiction neuroimaging.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.4%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
10
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
14
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
16
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
21
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%