Back

Differential virulence potential of different clades of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258

Chen, N.; Dresden, B. P.; Cassady, M.; Griffith, M. P.; Pless, L.; Harrison, L. H.; Shields, R. K.; Alcorn, J. F.; Van Tyne, D.

2026-03-30 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.28.26349612 medRxiv
Show abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) isolates belonging to multi-locus sequence type 258 (ST258) are a frequent cause of hospital-associated outbreaks and display extensive multidrug resistance. The KP ST258 lineage consists of two genetically distinct clades, called Clade 1 and Clade 2. These two clades are genetically related to one another, but are historically distinguished by having different capsular polysaccharide types. While bacteria belonging to both clades are isolated from clinical infections, Clade 2 is isolated more frequently compared to Clade 1. To investigate drivers of this difference in clade prevalence, we collected 172 clinical KP ST258 isolates from patients at a single medical center. Clinical review showed that patients infected with Clade 2 isolates were more acutely ill than Clade 1-infected patients, despite having fewer comorbidities. We also found that Clade 2 isolates were more resistant to killing by human serum, despite binding more complement protein C3 than Clade 1 isolates. Additionally, mice infected with a Clade 2 isolate had increased bacterial dissemination from the lungs to the liver and spleen than mice infected with a Clade 1 isolate, and this dissemination required an intact capsule locus. Increased dissemination in mice was not due to differential serum killing, as mouse serum was unable to kill isolates of either clade, but dissemination was associated with decreased macrophage uptake of the Clade 2 isolate. Taken together, these data suggest that KP ST258 Clade 2 is more virulent than Clade 1, though the specific mechanisms at play appear to differ between mice and humans.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.3%
2
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
7
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
8
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
23
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
27
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%