Thinking Out Loud: A Qualitative Study of Health Information User Experience in People with Disabilities
Sathe, S. S.; Porter, N.; Miller, C.; Rockwell, M.
Show abstract
Abstract Background People with disabilities use technology, like search engines, to seek health information online. This health information includes information on coronavirus disease, or COVID-19. COVID-19 remains a public health concern. Research shows that people with disabilities encounter frustrations, or "pain points," when seeking online information, but little is known about these specific pain points and who encounters them. Objective The goals of this study are to determine pain points for people with disabilities who seek health information online, and to assess how pain points impact the experience of technology use and information seeking. Methods Ten participants recruited from a prior quantitative survey completed the concurrent think-aloud study over a month-long period. Participants completed four online search tasks and narrated their experiences in real-time while doing so. Transcripts were stored in Taguette; thematic analysis was performed on these transcripts. Findings Participants were predominantly white, with three identifying as Asian. All ten participants reported having disabilities. Participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) reported distracting webpage layout, whereas participants with physical disabilities reported physical fatigue while navigating online information. All participants encountered AI-generated information; only one participant indicated trust in the AI-generated information. Other common sources of information included hospital and governmental webpages, peer-reviewed articles, and news and advertising results. News and advertising results were especially common with respect to search results for "COVID-19 vaccine." Themes identified included the following: accessibility/usability, AI-generated information, government/hospital and related sources of information, peer-reviewed articles, news and advertising, and sentiment and trust. Conclusions Information can be fatiguing, distracting, or otherwise difficult to navigate for people with diverse disabilities searching for COVID-19 related information online. Further work should incorporate user feedback from people with disabilities when designing online content.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 95%
- Applications and barriers to use of an mHealth iPhone application for self-management of chronic recurrent medical conditions: A Pilot Study 94%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Pandemic Journaling Project: A new dataset of first-person accounts of the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Development of a knowledge translation platform for ataxia: Impact on readers and volunteer contributors 94%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 95%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 96%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 93%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.