Back

Thinking Out Loud: A Qualitative Study of Health Information User Experience in People with Disabilities

Sathe, S. S.; Porter, N.; Miller, C.; Rockwell, M.

2026-03-31 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.28.26349601 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background People with disabilities use technology, like search engines, to seek health information online. This health information includes information on coronavirus disease, or COVID-19. COVID-19 remains a public health concern. Research shows that people with disabilities encounter frustrations, or "pain points," when seeking online information, but little is known about these specific pain points and who encounters them. Objective The goals of this study are to determine pain points for people with disabilities who seek health information online, and to assess how pain points impact the experience of technology use and information seeking. Methods Ten participants recruited from a prior quantitative survey completed the concurrent think-aloud study over a month-long period. Participants completed four online search tasks and narrated their experiences in real-time while doing so. Transcripts were stored in Taguette; thematic analysis was performed on these transcripts. Findings Participants were predominantly white, with three identifying as Asian. All ten participants reported having disabilities. Participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) reported distracting webpage layout, whereas participants with physical disabilities reported physical fatigue while navigating online information. All participants encountered AI-generated information; only one participant indicated trust in the AI-generated information. Other common sources of information included hospital and governmental webpages, peer-reviewed articles, and news and advertising results. News and advertising results were especially common with respect to search results for "COVID-19 vaccine." Themes identified included the following: accessibility/usability, AI-generated information, government/hospital and related sources of information, peer-reviewed articles, news and advertising, and sentiment and trust. Conclusions Information can be fatiguing, distracting, or otherwise difficult to navigate for people with diverse disabilities searching for COVID-19 related information online. Further work should incorporate user feedback from people with disabilities when designing online content.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
10
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
24
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%