Back

Automated Landmark-Based Root Inoculation in Arabidopsis Using Computer Vision and Robotics

Mansilha, F.; Chursin, F.; Nachev, B.; Gaalen, W. v.; Matache, V.; Lube, V.; Aswegen, D. v.; Harty, D. J.; Hamond, J. v.; Meline, V.; Mendes, M. P.; Noyan, M. A.

2026-03-31 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.27.714898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Manual inoculation of plant roots is labor-intensive, spatially imprecise, and limits experimental throughput in plant-microbe interaction studies. Here, we present an integrated computer vision and robotics pipeline for automated, landmark-based root inoculation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Seedlings grown on Gelrite plates were imaged using the HADES automated phenotyping platform at the Netherlands Plant Eco-Phenotyping Centre, Utrecht University. A U-Net-based segmentation model (RootNet, F1 = 0.80) identified root structures, from which primary root tips were localized with a mean error of 0.25 mm. An affine coordinate transformation (mean target registration error: 1.09 mm) mapped image coordinates to the workspace of an Opentrons OT-2 liquid handling robot for targeted dispensing of 10 {micro}L volumes. The system achieved successful inoculation in all 17 benchmark seedlings, corresponding to 100% accuracy (95% CI: 80-100%, Clopper-Pearson), and biological validation with fluorescent bacteria confirmed successful colonization along the root axis in 9 of 10 seedlings. To our knowledge, this is the first reported demonstration of automated, landmark-based root inoculation, extending the concept of automated phenotyping from passive measurement to active robotic intervention in real-time. The pipeline is generalizable to other root landmarks and organisms, enabling precise and reproducible delivery of microorganisms to specific root locations for systematic investigation of localized plant-microbe interactions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
22.9%
2
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
8
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
12
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
19
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
24
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
27
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
30
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%