Back

Automated Proofreading of Digitally Reconstructed NeuralMorphology Enhances Accuracy, Scalability, and Standardization

Emissah, H. A.; Tecuatl, C.; Ascoli, G. A.

2026-03-31 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.27.714818 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The rapid expansion of large-scale neuroscience datasets has increased the need for automated, accurate, and standardized quality control (QC). Manual proofreading of 3-dimensional neural morphology (SWC files) remains labor-intensive, error-prone, and non-scalable. We developed and evaluated a fully automated, machine-learning driven QC pipeline to standardize neural reconstructions, detect and correct structural anomalies, and rectify dendritic labeling in pyramidal neurons. Methods: We developed an end-to-end, cloud-deployed pipeline for automated QC, correction, and standardization of SWC-formatted neural morphologies. The framework integrates deterministic structural normalization, topology repair, geometric correction, quantitative morphometric analysis, and graph-based dendritic relabeling within a containerized React/Flask architecture deployed on Amazon Web Services. Rule-based algorithms systematically detect, classify, and correct structural irregularities including overlapping nodes, spurious side branches, non-positive radii, disconnected components, and anomalously long parent-child connections. A graph convolutional network, trained on Sholl-derived features from 20,500 pyramidal neurons, performs dendritic relabeling. Model training employed an 80/10/10 train-validation-test split with adaptive learning-rate scheduling and distributed execution across ten runs to evaluate stability and reproducibility. The pipeline generates images of the final product and computes quantitative morphometrics using L-Measure. Results: All neuronal reconstructions were processed without manual intervention. Automated normalization and topology repair restored structurally coherent and biologically accurate morphologies suitable for quantitative analysis and visualization without data loss. Dendritic relabeling achieved a mean accuracy of 99.51%, consistent between validation and test sets, with class-weighted precision of 0.978, recall of 0.977, and F1-score of 0.977. Enforcing a single apical dendritic tree per neuron improved anatomical consistency without reducing classification performance. Distributed training completed all runs in approximately 25 hours, demonstrating scalability and reproducibility for large datasets. Conclusions: We present a fully automated and cloud-scalable open-source pipeline for standardizing neural reconstructions and performing biologically consistent dendritic classification with near-perfect accuracy. The automated correction and relabeling procedures do not alter or compromise the size or unaffected morphological detail of the original SWC files, ensuring geometric fidelity and compatibility with downstream analysis tools. This open-access framework provides a robust foundation for high-throughput neural morphology curation and large-scale neuroanatomical analysis.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
11
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
18
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
23
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
27
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
29
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%