Back

Shifting Resilience: Trends and Predictors of Mesic Resource Productivity in Western U.S. Rangelands

Mueller, K. R.; Morford, S. L.; Kimball, J. S.; Smith, J. T.; Donnelly, P. J.; Naugle, D. E.

2026-03-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.27.714799 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mesic resources, the late-season herbaceous vegetation found in riparian areas and wet meadows, provide disproportionately important forage and habitat across western U.S. rangelands, yet their response to climatic variability and anthropogenic influences remains poorly understood. Using a 40-year Landsat time series (1984-2024), we quantified trends in late-season productivity (NDVI) across 4.5 million hectares of the sagebrush biome and applied random forest models to distinguish between temporal and spatial predictors of mesic resource productivity. We identified a fundamental shift in how mesic resources respond to drought: from 1984 to 2004, mesic productivity was strongly correlated with drought severity (Palmer Drought Severity Index, R{superscript 2} = 0.92), but this relationship weakened substantially in the next two decades (2005-2024; R{superscript 2} = 0.28), during which time productivity increased despite persistent aridity. Temporal modeling identified rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations as the strongest predictor of this shift, consistent with enhanced plant water-use efficiency under CO2 fertilization. Spatially, large agricultural valley floodplains act as anthropogenic refugia, sustaining productive mesic resources through flood irrigation and subsequent groundwater recharge into late summer. These findings suggest that human water management and physiological shifts in vegetation are currently buffering mesic systems against meteorological drought throughout U.S. rangelands. However, this apparent buffering is spatially heterogeneous and may mask vulnerability to groundwater depletion, shifts in precipitation regimes, and woody encroachment. Sustaining these vital ecosystems will require conservation approaches that go beyond climate monitoring to include balanced management considering both agricultural and ecological water needs and constraints.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.1%
2
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
5
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
8
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
12
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
15
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%