Back

WayFindR: Investigating Feedback in Biological Pathways

Bombina, P.; McGee, R. L.; Reed, J.; Abrams, Z.; Abruzzo, L. V.; Coombes, K. R.

2026-03-31 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.27.714788 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding biological pathways requires more than static diagrams. We present WayFindR, an R package that converts pathway data from WikiPathways and KEGG into graph structures using igraph, enabling computational analysis of regulatory features such as negative feedback loops. Rooted in control theory, negative feedback is essential for system stability, yet it is often underrepresented in curated pathway data. In this study, we systematically analyzed pathway information from both databases across multiple species and found that feedback loops--particularly negative ones--are rarely captured. This gap likely reflects both biological and technical challenges. Biologically, feedback mechanisms are inherently complex and often remain uncharted due to limited experimental focus. Technically, pathway databases frequently lack standardized annotations and complete representations of regulatory interactions, especially inhibitory edges that are crucial for identifying feedback. These observations underscore the need for improved data curation and consistent annotation practices to enhance our understanding of regulatory dynamics. By bridging the gap between static pathway diagrams and dynamic systems-level insights, WayFindR enables reproducible and scalable investigation of feedback regulation in cellular networks. The WayFindR R package can be downloaded from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/WayFindR/index.html). The processed data along with code for download can be accessed via the GitLab repository (https://gitlab.com/krcoombes/wayfindr).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.7%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
11
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
12
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
26
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%