Back

Length Scale-Dependent Dynamics in Electrostatic Protein Coacervates

Pedraza, E.; Tejedor, A. R.; S. Zorita, A.; Collepardo-Guevara, R.; De Sancho, D.; Llombart, P.; Rene Espinosa, J.

2026-03-31 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.27.714715 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biomolecular condensates formed by complex coacervation of highly charged proteins provide a powerful framework to understand how microscopic interactions give rise to macroscopic material properties. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations provide detailed insights but remain limited in accesing the spatio-temporal scales relevant for condensate behavior. Here, we use the residue-level coarse-grained Mpipi-Recharged model to investigate condensates formed by ProT and positively charged partners, including histone H1, protamine, poly-lysine, and poly-arginine. Material properties, in this context, provide a stringent experimental benchamark for coarse-grained models. Our model reproduces salt-dependent phase behavior, protein binding affinities, and sequence-specific stability trends in agreement with in vitro experiments, despite the fact that material properties were not included in the model parametrization. We then establish a direct link between protein dynamics and macroscopic material properties by quantifying monomeric diffusion, conformational reconfiguration, and translational mobility within the dense phase, and relating these to condensate viscosity. By comparing dynamics across dense and dilute phases, we uncover a pronounced length scale-dependent behavior. While residue-level binding and unbinding events remain equally fast in both phases, protein reconfiguration time and self-diffusion are significantly slowed down within the condensates. This decoupling reveals how fast intermolecular interactions coexist with slow mesoscale condensate dynamics depending on the molecular length scale. Together, our results establish a predictive framework that links encoded sequence intermolecular forces and multiscale dynamics to the emergent material properties of complex biomolecular condensates.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
3
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.3%
5
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
11
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
14
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
26
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%