Length Scale-Dependent Dynamics in Electrostatic Protein Coacervates
Pedraza, E.; Tejedor, A. R.; S. Zorita, A.; Collepardo-Guevara, R.; De Sancho, D.; Llombart, P.; Rene Espinosa, J.
Show abstract
Biomolecular condensates formed by complex coacervation of highly charged proteins provide a powerful framework to understand how microscopic interactions give rise to macroscopic material properties. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations provide detailed insights but remain limited in accesing the spatio-temporal scales relevant for condensate behavior. Here, we use the residue-level coarse-grained Mpipi-Recharged model to investigate condensates formed by ProT and positively charged partners, including histone H1, protamine, poly-lysine, and poly-arginine. Material properties, in this context, provide a stringent experimental benchamark for coarse-grained models. Our model reproduces salt-dependent phase behavior, protein binding affinities, and sequence-specific stability trends in agreement with in vitro experiments, despite the fact that material properties were not included in the model parametrization. We then establish a direct link between protein dynamics and macroscopic material properties by quantifying monomeric diffusion, conformational reconfiguration, and translational mobility within the dense phase, and relating these to condensate viscosity. By comparing dynamics across dense and dilute phases, we uncover a pronounced length scale-dependent behavior. While residue-level binding and unbinding events remain equally fast in both phases, protein reconfiguration time and self-diffusion are significantly slowed down within the condensates. This decoupling reveals how fast intermolecular interactions coexist with slow mesoscale condensate dynamics depending on the molecular length scale. Together, our results establish a predictive framework that links encoded sequence intermolecular forces and multiscale dynamics to the emergent material properties of complex biomolecular condensates.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.