Back

Which senses do wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) use for evaluating potential food items?

Ondina Ferreira da Silva Teixeira, C.; van de Waal, E.; Laska, M.; Motes-Rodrigo, A.

2026-03-30 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.27.714682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traditionally, primates have been considered primarily visual animals. However, studies across a variety of taxa suggest that, in the context of food evaluation, the reliance on this sense might be more nuanced that previously thought, with dietary specialization and food item properties leading to differences in sensory prioritization. We performed a field-based study assessing the use of sensory cues during food evaluation as well as food-related behaviours such as muzzle contact in two mixed-sex groups of wild vervet monkeys including three age classes over a period of five months (nmonkeys = 44). Using a total of 18868 food evaluation observations collected over 44 hours of focal follows, we found that vervets mainly relied on their sense of vision when evaluating food (96.8% of all instances). Sensory usage varied according to food category and sex differences were only observed in the use of smell for a subset of these. Juveniles initiated muzzle contact and used tactile inspection more often than adults whereas females received muzzle contact more often than males. In addition, the low rejection rates suggest that most food items were familiar to the vervets regardless of age and sex. These findings are in line with optimal foraging theory according to which the food evaluation process should be adapted to the familiarity of food items and allows individuals to maximize their intake of energy and critical nutrients, while minimizing the time and effort in food evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%