Back

Serum proteomics reveals distinct phenotypic signatures to IL-6 blockade between two immunotherapies

Sniezek, C.; Plubell, D.; Vlajic, K.; Hoofnagle, A.; Wu, C. C.; Buckner, J. H.; Schweppe, D. K.; Speake, C.; MacCoss, M. J.

2026-03-30 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.03.27.712461 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A recent clinical study tested the effects of two different monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (siltuximab, anti-IL6; tocilizumab, anti-IL6R) on the fate and function of T-cells in people with type 1 diabetes. While both mAbs affect the response of T-cells to stimulation, they have very different, sometimes opposing mechanisms. Here, we use mass-spectrometry based proteomics to analyze longitudinal serum samples (baseline and two weeks post-treatment) from 20 clinical trial participants to examine the effects of siltuximab and tocilizumab on extracellular vesicles. To accomplish this, serum samples were enriched for extracellular vesicles with Mag-Net and analyzed by LC-MS/MS to identify significantly differentially abundant protein groups and pathways. Proteome analysis confirmed highly reproducible measurements across multiple draw dates. In total, we quantified >3300 protein groups of which 46 protein groups had significantly altered abundance after mAb treatment. Tocilizumab altered pathways associated with proteostasis (neddylation) and pre-notch transcription and translation. Siltuximab altered FCGR activation pathway members. In addition, quantitation of the monoclonal antibody therapies themselves enabled the measurement of the correlation between drug amounts and impacted proteins. Taken together, this work demonstrates the utility of the Mag-Net method to evaluate the impacts of therapeutic interventions on serum extracellular vesicles.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
18.7%
3
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
7
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
9
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
14
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
17
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
20
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.5%
27
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%