Back

Vertical distribution of Phytophthora agathidicida oospore DNA in kauri forest soils: Implications for optimised sampling and disease monitoring

Palmer, J. T.; Hocking, E. M.; Gerth, M. L.

2026-03-28 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.26.714588 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phytophthora species are globally significant soilborne oomycetes responsible for widespread ecosystem decline. Standard soil sampling protocols, originally developed for qualitative baiting assays, typically require collecting substantial soil volumes in order to capture viable propagules. While effective for culture-based detection, these protocols are labour-intensive and can damage the shallow root systems of sensitive host species such as New Zealand kauri (Agathis australis). Phytophthora agathidicida (PA), the pathogen associated with kauri dieback disease, is routinely surveyed using these methods. However, quantitative data describing the vertical distribution of PA in natural forest soils are lacking. Consequently, it remains unclear whether extensive depth sampling is necessary to ensure consistent molecular detection. In this study, we applied a quantitative oospore DNA (oDNA) qPCR assay to characterise the fine-scale vertical distribution of PA across four soil depth increments (0-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 cm) from 12 kauri trees representing a range of disease stages. Results revealed distinct vertical stratification, with PA DNA concentrations peaking within the upper 0-10 cm of soil in non-symptomatic and possibly symptomatic trees. In symptomatic trees, the absolute peak occasionally reached 10-15 cm, while pathogen signals remained consistently detectable within the top 10 cm. Field validation from an additional eight trees confirmed that targeted 0-10 cm "shallow" sampling yielded higher PA concentrations than deeper sampling protocols. These findings provide a data-driven basis for refining soil sampling strategies, enabling more sensitive molecular detection while minimising disturbance and logistical effort in fragile ecosystems. IMPORTANCEPhytophthora species are among the most destructive soilborne pathogens globally, requiring robust diagnostic protocols for both agricultural and conservation settings. Traditional sampling frameworks were established to meet the biological requirements of baiting assays, which often necessitate collecting large soil volumes from broad depth profiles to ensure the capture of viable, infectious propagules. However, these extensive requirements are labour-intensive and can cause significant soil disturbance in sensitive forest ecosystems. Using P. agathidicida as a model, this study provides a high-resolution quantitative assessment of how pathogen DNA is distributed vertically across different disease stages. We demonstrate that while absolute peak abundance can shift within the 0-15 cm range as infection progresses, the pathogen signal remains consistently detectable within the top 10 cm. This evidence-based approach suggests that targeted, shallow sampling enhances sensitivity by reducing signal dilution, offering a lower-impact path for monitoring soilborne oomycetes worldwide.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
3
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
4
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
6
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
13
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
22
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
25
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
29
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%