Back

Tumor-immune trajectory context connects static tissue architecture to clinical outcomes

Cramer, E. M.; Heiland, R.; Lima da Rocha, H.; Bergman, D. R.; Gray, J. W.; Mills, G. B.; Fertig, E. J.; Macklin, P.; Heiser, L. M.; Chang, Y. H.

2026-03-30 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.26.714521 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiplexed tissue imaging (MTI) has revealed recurrent tumor microenvironment (TME) architectures with prognostic value, yet these measurements are inherently static, obscuring dynamic changes in the TME that govern therapeutic response. Here, we introduce a trajectory-centric framework that reconstructs continuous TME dynamics by integrating agent-based mathematical modeling and simulation with state space analysis. This approach yields a mechanistically constrained reference landscape built entirely from in silico simulation, and onto which static patient biospecimens can be projected and mapped onto simulated TME trajectories. Systematic simulation of tumor-immune interactions in triple-negative breast cancer identifies six metastable TME states connected by transition pathways spanning immune control to immune escape. Mapping MTI data from two independent patient cohorts, including longitudinal samples from a randomized immunotherapy trial, validates this landscape by positioning individual biospecimens along inferred TME trajectories rather than in static states. We show that treatment-phase TME states, but not pre-treatment configurations, robustly predict immunotherapy response, and identical terminal states can arise from distinct trajectory histories corresponding to immune failure or resolved inflammation. Thus, this framework enables mechanistic simulations to define a reference dynamical landscape that serves as a coordinate system for interpreting static clinical spatial data, providing a principled basis for evaluating consistency, predictiveness, and clinical relevance across independent patient cohorts. Altogether, this study advances spatial tumor profiling from static state classification of human tissues to dynamic trajectory inference, establishing a quantitative framework for trajectory-informed, state-guided, and temporally adaptive immunotherapy strategies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
2
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.8%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.4%
5
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
13
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
15
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
18
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
19
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
25
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
26
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
27
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
29
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%