Back

Redox-active di-O-methylated coumarins exudation contributes to genotype-dependent iron deficiency tolerance in soybean

Jimenez-Pastor, F. J.; Garcia-Cruz, E.; Bouzada-Diaz, R.; Abadia, J.; Rodriguez-Celma, J.; Alvarez-Fernandez, A.

2026-03-30 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.26.714459 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Iron (Fe) deficiency is a widespread disorder limiting global soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) production. Although root exudation is a key adaptive mechanism for Fe scarcity in species like Arabidopsis, a detailed chemical characterization of soybean exudates is lacking. Here, we examined the accumulation and secretion of phenolic compounds in soybean roots and their correlation with intraspecific tolerance to Fe-deficiency chlorosis. Seven soybean genotypes with contrasting tolerance, derived from U.S. breeding programs, were analyzed. Root exudates from Fe-deficient soybean plants solubilized ferric oxide. We identified and quantified 28 coumarin-type phenolics, with catechol methylsideretin as the predominant component. Although the qualitative coumarin profile was consistent across all genotypes, Fe-efficient lines secreted these compounds at higher levels or earlier during Fe deficiency than Fe-inefficient lines. The efficient genotype A7 showed coordinated upregulation of coumarin biosynthesis and secretion, whereas this response was weaker in the Fe-inefficient genotype IsoClark. Catechol methylsideretin concentrations strongly correlated with the ability of root exudates to mobilize Fe from ferric oxide. The conserved phenolic profile, together with divergence from those reported in non-legume species, suggests lineage-specific adaptations and ecological roles beyond Fe mobilization. These results highlight genotype-dependent exudation as a determinant of soybean Fe-deficiency tolerance, with implications for breeding. HIGHLIGHTIron deficiency induces soybean root exudates containing predominantly catechol methylsideretin which mobilize iron; genotypes differing in Fe efficiency show conserved qualitative but contrasting quantitative coumarin profiles.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.4%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
6
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
11
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
14
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
16
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
18
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
23
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%