Back

Activation mechanism of class A GPCRs: machine learninganalysis of experimental structural databases

Paajanen, S. E.; Eurasto, F.; Kulig, W.; Korshunova, K.; Kaptan, S.; Vattulainen, I.

2026-03-27 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.26.714415 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy and cryo-electron tomography have dramatically increased the number of class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structures, especially in previously inaccessible G protein-bound, active-like conformations. The increased structural diversity provides a unique opportunity to explore the conformational landscape underlying GPCR activation. To this end, we developed a machine learning (ML) framework that utilizes experimental structural data to elucidate the activation dynamics of class A GPCRs. We find that receptors can populate both inactive and active-like conformations even in the absence of ligand or G protein, providing a structural basis for agonist-free basal activity. Agonist binding shifts this conformational ensemble towards the active state but does not fully stabilize it. Instead, a stable active state is only established upon G protein binding, which locks the receptor in its active conformation. These results support a hybrid activation mechanism in which ligand binding follows conformational selection, while transducer engagement is governed by induced fit. Beyond clarifying class A GPCR activation, the openly available and modifiable ML framework provides a practical tool for analyzing newly determined structures, investigating the mechanisms of action of other GPCR classes and protein families, and guiding structure-based drug discovery in important pharmacological superfamilies. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=71 SRC="FIGDIR/small/714415v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19d1327org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1549782org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a6dfaaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a650ce_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.9%
10
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
15
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%