Back

Adherence to CDC Antimicrobial Stewardship Core Elements and Barriers to stewardship practices among Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Care Hospital Uttarakhand, India

K, K.; K, M.; Kumari, K.; Meena, K.; Pilania, M.; Kashyap, M.; Mahala, K.; Bhakar, M.; Kataria, N.; Singh, V.; Panda, P. K.; Sharma, M.

2026-03-28 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.03.26.26349469 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global health concern driven largely by inappropriate antimicrobial use. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) core elements, are essential for optimizing antimicrobial use. However, adherence to these practices and the barriers faced by healthcare workers remain inadequately explored, particularly in resource-limited settings. Objective To assess adherence to the CDC antimicrobial stewardship checklist and identify barriers affecting stewardship practices among healthcare workers at a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand, India. Methods A quantitative cross sectional descriptive study was conducted among 355 healthcare workers, including nursing officers and physicians. Data were collected using a sociodemographic questionnaire, the CDC antimicrobial stewardship checklist, and a self-structured barrier assessment tool (test retest reliability r = 0.78). Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied using SPSS version 23.0, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results The overall adherence to the CDC antimicrobial stewardship checklist was 52.3%, indicating moderate compliance. Higher adherence was observed in action-oriented interventions, while lower adherence was noted in domains such as accountability, pharmacy expertise, reporting, and education. Major barriers identified included lack of antimicrobial supply (89.0%), shortage of key personnel (88.5%), delays in laboratory reports (85.1%), lack of training (83.9%), and inadequate administrative support (79.2%). Significant associations were found between perceived barriers and factors such as working area, designation, qualification, and work experience (p < 0.05), whereas age and gender showed no significant association. Conclusion Adherence to antimicrobial stewardship practices was moderate, with notable gaps in organizational and educational components. Multiple systemic, resource-related, and behavioral barriers hinder effective implementation. Targeted interventions focusing on strengthening infrastructure, workforce capacity, training, and administrative support are essential to improve stewardship practices in tertiary care settings. Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, Antimicrobial stewardship program, Barriers, CDC Checklist

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
6
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
8
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
9
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
15
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%