Back

ECG spectrogram-based deep learning model to predict deterioration of patients with early sepsis at the emergency department: a study from the Acutelines data- and biobank

van Wijk, R. J.; Schoonhoven, A. D.; de Vree, L.; Ter Horst, S.; Gaidhane, C.; Alcaraz, J. M. L.; Strodthoff, N.; ter Maaten, J. C.; Bouma, H. R.; Li, J.

2026-03-27 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.03.26.26349371 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Early recognition of deterioration in patients with suspected infection at the emergency department (ED) is important. Current clinical scoring systems show limited discriminative performance for early deterioration. Continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings may offer additional dynamic physiological information that can enhance early prediction of deterioration in patients with suspected infection. Methods: We developed a multimodal, ECG-derived spectrogram-based pipeline to predict deterioration within 48 hours of ED admission. We used the first 20 minutes of ECG recordings for the spectrograms. We compared the model with the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), a baseline model with vital parameters, sex, and age, and a Heart Rate Variability (HRV) derived model. Results: In this study, 1321 patients were included, of whom 159 (12%) deteriorated. The multimodal model combining baseline data with spectrograms showed the best overall performance, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) of 0.788, followed by the baseline model (age, sex, triage vitals) alone, with an AUROC of 0.730. The HRV-only model and the qSOFA showed the lowest performance (AUROC 0.585 and 0.693, respectively). Conclusion: This study shows that ECG-derived multimodal spectrogram models outperform those based solely on vital signs and HRV features, as well as established clinical scores such as NEWS and qSOFA. Spectrogram analysis represents a promising approach to enhance early risk stratification and support clinical decision-making for patients with suspicion of infection in the ED.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.0%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.3%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
7
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%