Back

Greater sustained sensorimotor function recovery and neuropathic pain reduction with Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation compared to adaptive fitness in adults with spinal cord injury: a pilot clinical trial.

Van de Winckel, A.; Carpentier, S. T.; Bottale, S.; Blackwood, J.; Deng, W.; Zhang, L.; Hendrickson, T. J.; Mueller, B. A.; Nourian, R.; Melander-Smith, S.; Morse, L. R.; Lim, K. O.

2026-04-01 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.03.26.26349257 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) often experience reduced or lost sensation and movement, impairing the ability of the brain to locate paralyzed body parts, which, in turn, compromises sensorimotor recovery. This disruption of the internal body map of the brain, or mental body representations (MBR), also contributes to neuropathic pain in about 69% of adults with SCI. Medications for neuropathic pain are often ineffective and can cause adverse reactions. Our previous pilot clinical trial showed that Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation (CMR), a physical therapy that restores MBR, produced significant, lasting reductions in neuropathic pain, improved sensorimotor function, and enhanced brain function. Building on these results, we examined whether 8 weeks of CMR or adaptive fitness (1) improved sensorimotor function and reduced pain; (2) greater brain activity and connectivity related to sensorimotor function and MBR in adults with SCI. Methods: Sixteen participants (52+/-8 years old, 13+/-10 years post-SCI) were randomized to 8 weeks of CMR or adaptive fitness (45 min, 3x/week). Ten participants had neuropathic pain of 3/10 or greater. Pain and sensorimotor function were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), and Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (NRS). Functional MRI included resting-state and 4 tasks: imagining feeling the left leg, imagining moving the left leg, whole-body movement imagery, and a sensation task. Results: After CMR, participants improved on AIS with large effect sizes (touch: d=1.54; pinprick: d=1.83; lower limb motor function: d=1.32), while adaptive fitness had small/moderate effects (touch: d=0.49; pinprick: d=0.53; lower limb motor function: d=0.74). CMR also showed larger effect sizes for NRS (core: d=2.19; upper limb: d=0.69; lower limb: d=0.74) than fitness (core: d=0.73; upper limb: d=0.34; lower limb: d=0.00). Benefits persisted at follow-up. Highest neuropathic pain intensity reduced post-CMR and at 3-month follow-up (d=0.48; d=0.63). Pain increased slightly after fitness (n=6; d=-0.19; d=-0.41). CMR increased brain connectivity and activation during the leg imagery task. Increased activation during whole-body imagery was greater after CMR than fitness. Discussion: These preliminary results support the potential of CMR to improve function and reduce neuropathic pain in adults with SCI, warranting larger confirmatory trials. Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT05167032

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
10
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
26
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%