Back

Improving Automated Diagnosis of Middle and Inner Ear Pathologies by Estimating Middle Ear Input Impedance from Wideband Tympanometry

Kamau, A. F.; Merchant, G. R.; Nakajima, H. H.; Neely, S. T.

2026-03-31 otolaryngology
10.64898/2026.03.26.26349034 medRxiv
Show abstract

Conductive hearing loss (CHL) with a normal otoscopic exam can be difficult to diagnose because routine clinical measures such as audiometric air-bone gaps (ABGs) can identify a conductive component but often cannot distinguish among specific underlying mechanical pathologies (e.g., stapes fixation versus superior canal dehiscence, which may produce similar audiograms). Wideband tympanometry (WBT) is a fast, noninvasive test that can provide additional mechanical information across a broad range of frequencies (200 Hz to 8 kHz). However, WBT metrics are influenced by variations in ear canal geometry and probe placement and can be challenging to interpret clinically. In this study, we extend prior WBT absorbance-based classification work by estimating the middle ear input impedance at the tympanic membrane (ZME), a WBT-derived metric intended to reduce ear canal effects. To estimate ZME, we fit an analog circuit model of the ear canal, middle ear, and inner ear to raw WBT data collected at tympanometric peak pressure (TPP). Data from 27 normal ears, 32 ears with superior canal dehiscence, and 38 ears with stapes fixation were analyzed. A multinomial logistic regression classifier was trained using principal component analysis (retaining 90% variance) and stratified 5-fold cross-validation with regularization. We compared feature sets based on ABGs alone, ABGs combined with absorbance, and ABGs combined with the magnitude of ZME. The combination of ABGs and the magnitude of ZME produced the best performance, achieving an overall accuracy of 85.6% compared to 80.4% for ABGs alone and 78.4% for ABGs combined with absorbance. These results suggest that incorporating model-derived middle ear impedance features with standard audiometric measures (ABGs) can improve automated pathology classification for stapes fixation and superior canal dehiscence.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
11
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
22
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
26
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%