Improving Automated Diagnosis of Middle and Inner Ear Pathologies by Estimating Middle Ear Input Impedance from Wideband Tympanometry
Kamau, A. F.; Merchant, G. R.; Nakajima, H. H.; Neely, S. T.
Show abstract
Conductive hearing loss (CHL) with a normal otoscopic exam can be difficult to diagnose because routine clinical measures such as audiometric air-bone gaps (ABGs) can identify a conductive component but often cannot distinguish among specific underlying mechanical pathologies (e.g., stapes fixation versus superior canal dehiscence, which may produce similar audiograms). Wideband tympanometry (WBT) is a fast, noninvasive test that can provide additional mechanical information across a broad range of frequencies (200 Hz to 8 kHz). However, WBT metrics are influenced by variations in ear canal geometry and probe placement and can be challenging to interpret clinically. In this study, we extend prior WBT absorbance-based classification work by estimating the middle ear input impedance at the tympanic membrane (ZME), a WBT-derived metric intended to reduce ear canal effects. To estimate ZME, we fit an analog circuit model of the ear canal, middle ear, and inner ear to raw WBT data collected at tympanometric peak pressure (TPP). Data from 27 normal ears, 32 ears with superior canal dehiscence, and 38 ears with stapes fixation were analyzed. A multinomial logistic regression classifier was trained using principal component analysis (retaining 90% variance) and stratified 5-fold cross-validation with regularization. We compared feature sets based on ABGs alone, ABGs combined with absorbance, and ABGs combined with the magnitude of ZME. The combination of ABGs and the magnitude of ZME produced the best performance, achieving an overall accuracy of 85.6% compared to 80.4% for ABGs alone and 78.4% for ABGs combined with absorbance. These results suggest that incorporating model-derived middle ear impedance features with standard audiometric measures (ABGs) can improve automated pathology classification for stapes fixation and superior canal dehiscence.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients 97%
- A level adjusted cochlear frequency-to-place map for estimating tonotopic frequency mismatch with a cochlear implant 96%
- Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-in-Noise Test using Antiphasic Stimuli 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- ABRpresto: An algorithm for automatic thresholding of the Auditory Brainstem Response using resampled cross-correlation across subaverages 96%
- The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT™) test: a clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test 96%
- Brainstem Auditory Physiology in Children with Listening Difficulties 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study 96%
- Differentiating Causes of Post-Surgical Conductive Hearing Loss with Optical Coherence Tomography Vibrometry 95%
- Optimizing auditory brainstem response acquisition using interleaved frequencies 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.