Back

'RMT-Finder': an automated procedure to determine the Resting Motor Threshold for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Boidequin, L. F.; Moreno-Verdu, M.; Waltzing, B. M.; Lambert, J. J.; Van Caenegem, E. E.; Truong, C.; Hardwick, R. M.

2026-03-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.25.714235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies identify the Resting Motor Threshold (RMT) to calibrate stimulation intensity. However, this procedure is time-consuming and subject to variability. We developed an automated procedure to improve the efficiency and standardization of RMT determination. New methodWe developed an algorithm that measures MEP amplitudes and automatically adjusts stimulation intensity to determine the RMT. Experiment 1 compared this automated method with the manual procedure in terms of reliability and equivalence. Experiment 2 developed a "Fast" automated process, assessing it against both the manual and initial automated procedures. ResultsAcross both experiments the automated approach demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and strong agreement with the manual method (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients [&ge;]0.95), giving estimates of RMT statistically equivalent to those of manual measurements within {+/-}3% MSO, with the majority of comparisons within {+/-}2% MSO. Experiment 2 optimized the procedure, allowing empirical determination of the RMT in an average of <3 minutes with only 33-34 pulses. Comparison with existing methods RMT-Finder provides a reliable and time-efficient alternative to manual approaches. To the best of our knowledge RMT-Finder presents the first closed-loop feedback approach to identify the RMT without manual intervention. This procedure can improve standardization and reproducibility in TMS studies. ConclusionsAutomating RMT assessment allows rapid and highly reproducible assessment of this standard TMS measurement, making it viable for inclusion in routine clinical applications that require standardized procedures.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.6%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
7
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
9
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
20
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
30
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%