Back

A Bidirectional Neural Interface With Direct On-Device Neuromorphic Decoding for Closed-Loop Optogenetics

Bilodeau, G.; Miao, A.; Gagnon-Turcotte, G.; Ethier, C.; Gosselin, B.

2026-03-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.25.714179 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bidirectional interfaces combined with neural de-coding algorithms are essential for closed-loop (CL) neuromodulation, enabling simultaneous neural monitoring and responsive optogenetic stimulation. However, implementing these capabilities in compact wireless headstages for freely moving animals remains challenging, as most existing platforms rely on tethered setups and external processors to execute computationally intensive decoders. This work presents the design and optimization of a neural decoder integrated into a bidirectional wireless system for CL optogenetic experiments in rodents. The proposed platform combines 32-channel electrophysiological recording with neuromorphic feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and a nonlinear support vector machine (NL-SVM) decoder implemented on a resource-constrained Spartan-6 FPGA. Temporal dynamics are captured using spike-count features and leaky integrators, while principal component analysis (PCA) reduces the feature space to six components, enabling sub-millisecond inference with minimal memory and power requirements. Model size is further reduced using k-means clustering during training to limit the number of support vectors. Decoder performance was validated using datasets from non-human primate and rat motor cortex recordings. The proposed decoder achieved accuracy comparable to convolutional neural networks (R2 =0.85 vs. 0.87) and outperformed Wiener filters (R2 = 0.81) while requiring significantly fewer computational resources. The full system was further demonstrated in vivo through wireless closed-loop optogenetic stimulation in rats, achieving a variance accounted for (VAF) of 0.9148. Overall, this work introduces a versatile, fully self-contained, and resource-efficient platform for real-time untethered closed-loop neuroscience experiments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.6%
4
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
12
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
16
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
21
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
24
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%