A numerical bias in honeybees: Numerousness is more salient than space and size non-numerical cues during quantity discrimination.

Despite growing evidence that many animals can evaluate quantities, the ecological relevance of numerical cognition remains debated, particularly outside vertebrates. Would individuals still rely on numerousness if less computationally demanding cues, visual features extracted at the early stage of visual processing, were available to assess quantity? In primates, individuals show a numerical bias as they tend to rely on the number of items rather than non-numerical cues, such as total area, to categorize quantities. In this study, we trained free-flying honeybees to discriminate between two and four items in conditions where numerosity covaried with the total area and perimeter (Experiment Size) or the convex hull (Experiment Space) cues, mimicking ecological contexts. Transfer tests assessed which numerical or non-numerical cues were learned and preferentially used by the bees. Bees primarily relied on numerousness over these non-numerical cues. Individual analyses revealed two consistent strategies: a "numerical bias" strategy, in which bees encoded numerical information while ignoring non-numerical cues, and a "generalist" strategy, where bees flexibly switched between cues and favored non-numerical information when cues conflicted. We further reported improved discrimination when smaller quantities appeared on the left and larger ones on the right, consistent with an oriented mental number line. Together, these findings demonstrate a spontaneous numerical bias in honeybees and reveal that individuals within the same species can adopt distinct strategies when evaluating quantity. Our findings also suggest that distantly related taxa like bees and primates may have independently evolved comparable mechanisms for quantity evaluation.