Back

Decoding of arousal and valence from fMRI data obtained during emotion inductions

White, J. S.; Ding, Y.; Muncy, N. M.; Graner, J. L.; Faul, L.; LaBar, K. S.

2026-03-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.25.714036 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arousal and valence are fundamental dimensions of affective experience signifying levels of activation and pleasantness, respectively. These dimensions play a crucial role in shaping emotional responses and behaviors, with significant implications for psychopathology. Previous machine learning studies had some success decoding these states from brain activation patterns observed during task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), but the results have varied across studies. Moreover, prior studies have often been limited by small sample sizes, weak decoding performance, and non-whole-brain analyses, leaving the neural representations of arousal and valence largely unresolved. Here we successfully decoded arousal and valence from whole-brain task-fMRI data collected from 132 participants during exposure to 300 unique emotional stimuli, including 150 movie clips and 150 text scenarios that reliably induced a wide range of arousal and valence states. Mass univariate general linear models identified block-level activation (emotion stimuli > washout) from all gray matter voxels. Multivariate regression analysis predicted arousal and valence ratings based on these gray matter activations. Patterns in the fMRI data underlying arousal and valence were robust, as they were successfully decoded across both induction modalities using five different linear multivariate regression models. Although significant, decoding from scenarios was less successful than from movies, likely due to their more imaginative nature. In particular, decoding arousal from scenarios only showed low predictive utility. Representations of arousal and valence were widespread throughout the brain, and we reveal cerebellar and brainstem contributions that have largely been absent in past fMRI decoding studies. These findings clarify the distributed neural basis of arousal and valence and provide a foundation for future clinical research on the role of these constructs in affective dysregulation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.2%
2
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
3
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.5%
12
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
14
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
15
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
16
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
19
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
20
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
21
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
22
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%