Frontal theta phase modulates asymmetric posterior neural mechanisms of spatial attention
Darrell, M.; Vanneau, T.; Brittenham, C.; Foxe, J. J.; Molholm, S. J.
Show abstract
Selective attention enables prioritization of behaviorally relevant information through coordinated control of neural excitability. Although theta-band (3-7 Hz) rhythms are implicated in top-down attentional sampling in non-human primates, how intrinsic theta phase organizes sensory gain and behavior in humans, and whether this control operates symmetrically across hemispheres, remains unknown. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) and pupillometry in typically developing human participants (n = 21; 14.7 {+/-} 3.8 YO) performing a covert spatial attention task. Behaviorally, participants responded faster during leftward relative to rightward attention. This behavioral asymmetry was paralleled in the neural data: anticipatory modulation of parieto-occipital alpha and beta power emerged selectively during leftward attention, whereas rightward attention did not recruit comparable posterior oscillatory processes. Mechanistically, ipsilateral fronto-central theta phase emerged as a potential driver of this asymmetry. Intrinsic theta phase predicted trial-by-trial reaction time (RT) in a cue-direction-specific manner. During leftward attention, 3-Hz theta-phase over left fronto-central cortex modulated behavior and was significantly coupled to coordinated posterior alpha-band activity. In contrast, 6-7-Hz theta-phase over right fronto-central cortex modulated behavior during rightward attention but showed no relationship with alpha or beta modulation; instead, it modulated early sensory gain, indexed by P1 amplitude. Consistent with these distinct architectures, RT was jointly predicted by lower pre-stimulus alpha power and higher P1 amplitude over the attended hemisphere during leftward attention, whereas only P1 amplitude predicted performance during rightward attention. Resting-state alpha power did not differ across hemispheres, indicating that these effects were task-evoked rather than baseline spectral differences. Critically, older participants, who demonstrated enhanced behavioral performance, also exhibited a larger hemispheric asymmetry. Together, these findings reveal developmentally emerging, direction-specific neural control dynamics underlying human spatial attention. Significance StatementSpatial attention is often assumed to rely on symmetric neural mechanisms across left and right space. Using EEG in typically developing children and adolescents, we show that intrinsic theta rhythms organize attention through direction-specific control architectures. Leftward attention engages slower frontal theta (3-Hz) that coordinates posterior alpha and beta activity, consistent with oscillatory sensory gating. Rightward attention instead relies on faster theta (6-7-Hz) that modulates early sensory responses without coordinated alpha dynamics. These asymmetric mechanisms occur despite lack of hemispheric differences in resting alpha activity, indicating that they emerge during active control rather than reflecting baseline biases. These findings reveal that human attentional sampling is rhythmically organized but fundamentally asymmetric across space.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential and overlapping effects between exogenous and endogenous attention shape perceptual facilitation during visual processing 97%
- Implicit versus explicit timing - separate or shared mechanisms? 97%
- Neural repetition suppression modulates time perception: evidence from electrophysiology and pupillometry 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Task-related modulation of event-related potentials does not reflect changes to sensory representations 97%
- Characterising time-on-task effects on oscillatory and aperiodic EEG components and their co-variation with visual task performance. 97%
- Theta activity discriminates high-level, species-specific body processes 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.