Back

The Duplicate Monophyly Criterion: An Empirical Approach to Bootstrapping Distance-Based Structural Phylogenies

Malik, A. J.; Ascher, D.

2026-03-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.25.713827 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Distance-based structural phylogenies summarise relationships between proteins using pairwise structural similarity scores. Unlike character-based methods, however, they lack a natural analogue of the non-parametric bootstrap. Because distances derived from continuous, high-dimensional folds provide no discrete sites to resample, rigorous support estimation would ideally rely on conformational ensembles from Molecular Dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations, which is computationally prohibitive at scale. A practical alternative is parametric bootstrapping in distance space, but this introduces a calibration problem: without an objective estimate of the signal-to-noise ratio, the perturbation magnitude cannot be chosen in a principled way. Here, we introduce the Duplicate Monophyly Criterion (DMC), an empirical strategy for calibrating distance-matrix perturbations using synthetic taxon duplicates as internal controls. We expand the observed distance matrix with virtual copies of each taxon, assign each original-duplicate pair a small baseline distance, and apply a floor-augmented heteroscedastic noise model directly in distance space. The central hypothesis is that loss of duplicate monophyly (i.e., failure of taxon-duplicate pairs to form two-tip cherries) marks a regime in which perturbations overwhelm intrinsic phylogenetic signal, thereby defining a conservative operating range for stability-based (bootstrap-like) support estimation. As a practical use case, we select a dataset-specific perturbation level{lambda} * as the largest noise level that retains a target fraction of duplicate pairings (e.g., [≥] 90%), and report split frequencies across replicate trees generated at{lambda} * as support values. We validate the framework in a geometric toy model where evolving two-dimensional shapes provide a known ground-truth topology, and in an empirical globin benchmark using distances derived from 1 - TM-score. Across both settings, duplicate monophyly tracks the erosion of tree structure under distance-matrix noise, establishing an internally calibrated "resolution limit" for assigning confidence in distance-based structural phylogenetics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.