Back

Validated CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs targeting neurodevelopmental genes in the tunicate Ciona robusta

Popsuj, S.; Kalsang, T.; Kim, K.; Drummond, E.; Manekar, P.; Munagapati, P.; Oleti, M.; Sato, H.; Vickery, I.; Gigante, E. D.; Stolfi, A.

2026-03-27 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.03.25.711585 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of the central nervous system (CNS) depends on tightly regulated gene expression programs that guide neural progenitor differentiation and neuronal subtype specification. The tunicate Ciona robusta provides a powerful and simplified model for dissecting the genetic control of nervous system development, with a larval CNS composed of just over 200 neurons and sensory cells. Although CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis is now routinely used in Ciona, validated single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) have yet to be validated for key neural genes. Here, we report the design and experimental validation of 25 novel sgRNAs targeting eight conserved genes encoding conserved proteins involved in neurodevelopment and neural function, including six transcription factors (Cdx, Foxb, Sox1/2/3, Dmbx, Engrailed, and Mnx) and two neural effector genes (Tyrosinase and Slc18a3/VAChT). Candidate sgRNAs were selected using CRISPOR and tested for mutagenesis efficiency using Illumina-based target site amplicon sequencing. All sgRNAs induced insertions or deletions at their target loci, with most genes yielding at least one sgRNA with mutagenesis efficacy exceeding 30%, with the exception of Dmbx, for which maximal efficacy reached 25%. We further compared measured mutagenesis rates with predicted Doench 16 and Doench Ruleset 3 (RS3) scores, observing a modest but improved correlation with RS3 predictions. Based on these results, we recommend considering both scoring algorithms, with RS3 potentially offering improved predictive value for Ciona.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.6%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
6
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
7
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
10
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
19
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.7%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
24
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%