Back

Integrating Computational Optimization with Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Particle Swarm Optimization Framework for Enhancing Fluoride Toothpaste Formulations

Asuai, C.; Whiliki, O.; Mayor, A.; Victory, D.; Imarah, O.; Irene, D.; Merit, I.; Hosni, H.; Khan, M. I.; Edwin, A. C.

2026-03-27 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349293 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study develops a methodological framework that combines conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing with Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) to enhance toothpaste formulations, employing Escherichia coli isolated from the oral cavity as a model organism. We used the agar well diffusion method to see if two fluoride toothpastes (Oral B and My-my) could kill oral E. coli isolates at 6.25%, 12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100% concentrations. A surrogate Random Forest model was created using these experimental data to link formulation parameters to antimicrobial activity. Then, PSO was used to find the best formulation traits. Multi-objective optimisation that looks at the trade-offs between antimicrobial effectiveness and cytotoxicity was shown as a conceptual framework. Both toothpastes showed antimicrobial activity that depended on the concentration, with Oral B being more effective (23.0 mm at 100% concentration) than My-my (20.0 mm). The PSO framework, utilised as a methodological illustration while explicitly recognising data constraints, determined hypothetical formulation parameters (sodium fluoride 1100 ppm, hydrated silica abrasive, 2.5% SLS) with an anticipated zone of inhibition of 26.3 mm. These predictions are mathematically optimal for a surrogate model that was trained on very little data (n=10 formulation points). They need a lot of experimental testing before any claims about the formulation can be made. This work is presented as a proof-of-concept methodological framework, not as validated formulation guidance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.