Back

Machine learning-based advanced coronary artery disease pretest probability model: Comparison with conventional pretest probability models

Hong, Y.; Lee, J.; Park, H.-B.; Kim, W.; Yoon, Y. E.; Jeong, H.; Kim, G.; So, B.; Lee, J.; Dalakoti, M.; Sung, J. M.; Kook, W.; Chang, H.-J.

2026-03-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.25.26348861 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Pretest probability (PTP) models using clinical risk factors guide decision-making for coronary artery disease (CAD). Existing models (Updated Diamond-Forrester [UDF] and CAD Consortium [CAD2]) exhibit suboptimal predictive efficacy in Asian populations due to ethnic differences in atherosclerosis and risk profiles. We developed an advanced CAD-specific PTP model using ridge-penalized logistic regression and validated its reliability. Methods: Utilizing data from 4,696 Korean patients (3 trials and 2 cohorts), we employed ridge regression to develop an advanced PTP model (K-CAD) for identifying patients with CAD with >=50% diameter stenosis, determined using coronary computed tomography or invasive coronary angiography. External validation used datasets from another tertiary center (External Validation Cohort 1, n=428) and a nationwide health checkup cohort (External Validation Cohort 2, n=117,294). We compared K-CAD with existing models using continuous receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and ternary net reclassification improvement (NRI) analyses. Findings: Continuous ROC analysis in External Validation Cohort 1 revealed areas under the curves (AUCs) for UDF, 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.73); CAD2, 0.71 (95%CI 0.67-0.76), and K-CAD, 0.76 (95%CI 0.71-0.80). K-CAD significantly outperformed UDF (p <0.001) and CAD2 (p <0.05). NRI analysis demonstrated that K-CAD improved reclassification of non-obstructive patients into low-risk categories. External validation using the nationwide dataset (surrogate endpoint: ICD-10 I20) yielded AUCs for UDF, 0.61 (95% CI 0.58-0.64); CAD2, 0.66 (95%CI 0.63-0.69); and K-CAD, 0.67 (95%CI 0.64-0.70). Interpretation: The study demonstrated K-CAD's utility employing extensive high-quality datasets, highlighting its potential for predicting CAD risk in the Korean population.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.