HbA1c-based diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and complication risk are distorted in British south Asians due to HbE thalassaemia trait
Hodgson, S.; L'Esperance, V.; Samuel, M.; Siddiqui, M.; Stow, D.; Armirola-Ricaurte, C.; Genes & Health Research Team, ; van Heel, D. A.; Mathur, R.; McKinley, T.; Barroso, I.; Taylor, J.; Finer, S.
Show abstract
Background: Genetic variants impacting red blood cell biology disrupt the relationship between glycaemia and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), with implications for diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Thalassaemia trait is estimated to affect 350 million people globally, but its impact on T2D and related outcomes is not clear. Methods: We explored associations between thalassaemia trait, HbA1c, and T2D diagnosis and complications in 43,088 British Bangladeshi and Pakistani participants in the Genes & Health study with linked multisource England National Health Service (NHS) electronic health record data and whole exome sequencing. Findings: 2,490 participants (5.8%) were heterozygous carriers of ClinVar pathogenic / likely pathogenic thalassaemia variants, however 3 in 4 of these were not diagnosed with thalassaemia in their NHS health records. rs33950507, a common variant causal for HbE thalassaemia, was associated with increased HbA1c (beta=0.13, 95%CI:0.08-0.18, p=7.8x10-8), but not glucose levels (beta=0.01, 95%CI:-0.04-0.06, P=0.72). rs33950507 was associated with increased hazards of prediabetes (HR=1.38, 95%CI:1.26-1.52, p=2.2x10-6) and T2D (HR=1.11, 95%CI:1.01-1.22, p=0.03), and reduced hazards of diabetic eye disease (HR=0.74, 95%CI:0.56-0.96, p=0.02) and cerebrovascular disease (HR=0.44, 95%CI:0.20-0.94, p=0.03). Sensitivity analyses suggested mediation by overdiagnosis and overtreatment of T2D. Interpretation: Alternatives to HbA1c, and/or precision medicine approaches to defining and managing hyperglycaemia, are needed, particularly on a global scale. This may be particularly relevant to individuals from ancestral groups among whom erythrocytic traits are more common but often undiagnosed. Funding: Wellcome Trust, MRC, NIHR, Barts Charity, Genes & Health Industry Consortium
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Widespread recessive effects on common diseases in a cohort of 44,000 British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis with high autozygosity 95%
- Whole genome sequencing association analysis of quantitative red blood cell phenotypes: the NHLBI TOPMed program 95%
- Identification of actionable genetic variants in 4,198 Scottish volunteers from the Viking Genes research cohort and implementation of return of results 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic discovery and risk prediction for type 1 diabetes in individuals without high-risk HLA-DR3/DR4 haplotypes 93%
- Poor in-utero growth, reduced beta cell secretion and high plasma glucose in childhood are harbingers of glucose intolerance in young Indians 92%
- Specific type 1 diabetes risk genes underpin age-at-diagnosis and indicate joint defects in immunity, beta-cell fragility and responses to viral infections in early-onset disease. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing common and rare variations in non-traditional glycemic biomarkers using multivariate approaches on multi-ancestry ARIC study 94%
- Integrative proteogenomic analyses provide novel interpretations of type 1 diabetes risk loci through circulating proteins 94%
- Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis Using a Recessive Model Illuminates Genetic Architecture of Type 2 Diabetes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetic and phenotypic correlates of neonatal Complement Component 3 and 4 protein concentrations with a focus on psychiatric and autoimmune disorders 93%
- Effects of parental autoimmune diseases on type 1 diabetes in offspring can be partially explained by HLA and non-HLA polymorphisms 92%
- Genotyping and population structure of the China Kadoorie Biobank 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.