Back

Assessing Brain-Behaviour Coupling in Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Using Reliable Change Indices: Evidence from pre-Supplementary Motor Area - right Inferior Frontal Gyrus transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Fujiyama, H.; Wansbrough, K.; Lebihan, B.; Tan, J.; Levin, O.; Mathersul, D. C.; Tang, A. D.

2026-03-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.24.714072 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NiBS) studies frequently report exploratory correlations between individual-level changes in neurophysiological and behavioural measures. However, these analyses are typically underpowered and rely on ratio-based change scores with known statistical limitations. We addressed these limitations by pooling individual data from three independent studies (total N = 69), providing adequate power to detect small-to-medium effects. All studies applied 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) targeting the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) and right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), regions central to inhibitory control. Changes in preSMA-rIFG connectivity measured with EEG imaginary coherence (ImCoh) and response inhibition (stop-signal reaction time, SSRT) were quantified using reliable change indices (RCI), which were z-standardised within studies to enable pooled mixed-effects regression. No meaningful association was found between tACS-induced ImCoh change and SSRT change (r = .013, marginal R{superscript 2} = .004), with project-wise correlations that were small, non-significant, and inconsistent in direction. Sensitivity analysis using ratio-based change scores converged on the same null result (r = .014), though ratio scores showed severe distributional violations relative to the approximately normal RCI distributions, supporting the methodological case for RCI on statistical grounds. These results provide no support for a systematic individual-level brain-behaviour coupling between preSMA-rIFG connectivity and response inhibition following 20 Hz tACS, and suggest that any true effect is likely to be small. The present work offers a methodological benchmark for quantifying individual-level brain-behaviour coupling in NiBS research, and highlights the need for more sensitive neural markers and adequately powered design.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.0%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.0%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
8
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
19
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
25
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.6%
28
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%