Back

Host community activity, but not always composition, explains viral biogeography in bulk and rhizosphere soils over a tomato growing season

Stern, L.; ter Horst, A. M.; Simpson-Johnson, K. E.; Gaudin, A. C. M.; Emerson, J. B.

2026-03-30 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.24.714046 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The soil microbiome is key to plant health and nutrient acquisition, and viruses likely play important but largely unknown roles in these processes. To interrogate bulk and rhizosphere soil viral biogeography, we collected samples over a tomato growing season in California from an experiment testing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) treatment. We generated 78 viromes, 16S rRNA gene, and ITS1 amplicon datasets, and 33 rhizosphere metatranscriptomes. Of 67,038 DNA viral species genomes (vOTUs), 25% were previously identified, predominantely in agricultural systems, suggesting habitat filtering and greater viral homogeneity across agricultural compared to natural soils globally. Rhizospheres had significantly higher DNA viral richness than bulk soils, whereas no significant richness differences were observed for other biota. 60% of vOTUs were shared between compartments, compared to only 21-23% of bacterial and fungal taxa. Although bulk soil viral biogeography resembled that of prokaryotes, with significant structuring by moisture content, greater virome similarity between high-moisture bulk soils and rhizospheres suggests that conditions with high host activity selected for similar viral communities. In rhizospheres, while bacterial and fungal communities differed most over time, DNA and RNA viral communities differed most by sampling location, matching prokaryotic transcriptional patterns and further implicating host activity in viral biogeography. Similarly, AMF treatment induced changes in the prokaryotic transcriptome but, across biota, only significantly affected DNA viral communities. Overall, results indicate strong viral responses to spatiotemporally localized conditions, with viral biogeography reflecting both dispersal opportunities (high between neighboring bulk and rhizosphere soils, low across fields) and selection via local host activity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
4
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
7
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
11
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
12
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
15
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.6%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
21
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
25
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
26
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
29
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%