Back

Scaling-Up Vertical-Wheel Bioreactors Based on Cell Aggregate Exposure to Shear Stress and Energy Dissipation Rate

Bauer, J. E. S.; Alibhai, F. J.; Vatani, P.; Romero, D. A.; Laflamme, M. A.; Amon, C. H.

2026-03-26 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.24.713990 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeLarge quantities of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are required for clinical applications. 3D suspension cultures are suitable for large scale manufacturing of hPSCs but yield, viability and quality are affected by the hydrodynamic environment. This paper characterizes the hydrodynamic environment inside vertical wheel bioreactors (VWBRs) as a function of size and agitation rates, measures its effect on cell aggregation and proliferation, and proposes the use of Lagrangian-based shear stress and energy dissipation rate (EDR) exposures to support scale-up. MethodsIn silico: Transient, 3D, turbulent flow simulations are conducted for two VWBR sizes (100, 500 mL) at five agitation rates between 20 and 80 rpm. Trajectories of cell aggregates of sizes from 200 to 1,000 microns are calculated, and shear stress and EDR exposures are collected along these trajectories. In vitro: ESI-017 hPSCs were cultured in VWBRs for 6 days. Aggregation efficiency and daily fold ratios were calculated based on cell counts and initial inoculation density. ResultsAggregate size, agitation rate and bioreactor size modulate cell aggregate exposures to EDR and shear stress, which significantly depart from maximum or volume average metrics used for scale-up. Combined in vitro/in silico results show EDR affects aggregation efficiency, cell counts and aggregate size, and has a small effect on daily fold ratios but a significant effect on total fold ratio. ConclusionHistory of trajectory-based cell aggregate exposures to EDRs provide a better scale-up basis for VWBRs than volume-averaged EDR. Shear stress does not significantly affect hPSC aggregation, proliferation and expansion in VWBRs under the tested conditions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.4%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
8
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
10
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
14
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%