Back

Is metabolism spatially optimized? Structural modeling of consecutive enzyme pairs reveals no evidence for spatial optimization of catalytic site proximity.

Algorta, J.; Walther, D.

2026-03-26 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.24.713955 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolic pathways are often hypothesized to benefit from the spatial organization of enzymes, facilitating substrate transfer through mechanisms such as metabolic channeling or metabolon formation. However, it remains unclear whether the spatial proximity of catalytic sites represents a general organizational principle of metabolism or is restricted to specific pathways. Here, we investigate whether consecutive enzymes in metabolic pathways, when physically interacting, exhibit structurally optimized arrangements that minimize distances between their catalytic sites, thereby increasing metabolite transfer efficiency from one enzyme to the next. We first evaluated the ability of current protein-protein interaction prediction methods, including AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, ESMFold, and HDOCK, to model weak and transient interactions using a benchmark dataset of 112 low-affinity protein dimers from PDBbind. AlphaFold-based approaches performed best in recovering correct interaction geometries, while ESMFold showed limited performance. We further assessed several confidence metrics and identified ipTM, ipSAE, and VoroIF-GNN as the most informative predictors of correct interaction conformations. In addition to simple Euclidean distance metrics, we developed a computational procedure to estimate shortest accessible space paths between catalytic sites in predicted enzyme-enzyme complexes. Applying this framework to 107 consecutive enzyme pairs in E.coli revealed an increased tendency for consecutive enzymes to interact, but no systematic evidence that interacting enzymes position their catalytic sites in spatially optimized configurations. In the predicted complex conformations, catalytic sites tend not to be positioned closer than expected at random. The developed computational workflow provides a general framework for analyzing structural aspects of metabolic organization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.1%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
8
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
9
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
10
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
13
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
17
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
23
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
25
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
29
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%