Back

Mechanical and morphological effects of intervertebral disc injury: a systematic review of in vivo animal studies

Xiao, F.; van Dieën, J. H.; Vidal Itriago, A.; Han, J.; Maas, H.

2026-03-25 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.24.713901 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) compromises disc structures and mechanics, yet systematic evaluations of the mechanical responses and their relationship to morphological changes in preclinical models remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized mechanical and morphological alterations following experimental disc injury in in vivo animal models. Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using modified CAMARADES and SYRCLE tools. Twenty-eight studies were included. Pooled analyses showed significant reductions in stiffness, Youngs modulus, and disc height, and significant increases in range of motion and degeneration grade, indicating both mechanical and structural deterioration. Youngs modulus appeared to be the most sensitive marker of functional degeneration. By contrast, creep and other viscoelastic responses showed non-significant changes. High heterogeneity was evident across studies, reflecting variability in injury models, species, timepoints, and testing methods. Evidence of publication bias was detected in several domains, and moderate methodological quality was noted with overall insufficient blinding and lack of sample size calculations. In vivo animal models of IVDD demonstrate robust and consistent mechanical and morphological degeneration after injury. Youngs modulus is a sensitive mechanical indicator, supporting its use in future preclinical research. Standardization of outcome definitions, methodology, and reporting is essential to improve comparability and enhance translation of preclinical findings to clinical research.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
3
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
10
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
17
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%