Back

Road proximity differentially shapes rodent-mediated seed dispersal frequency and distance

Craveiro, J.; Bugalho, M.; Vaz, P. G.

2026-03-26 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.24.713877 bioRxiv
Show abstract

By concentrating rodents along verges, roads can reshape rodent-mediated seed dispersal, yet empirical tests remain scarce. We conducted a two-year field experiment in Mediterranean oak woodlands in southern Portugal to test how seed dispersal varies with distance from roads across road type (paved vs. unpaved) and road-forest context (edge vs. non-edge). We tracked labeled holm oak acorns, recording dispersal distances and the number of dispersal events. The two metrics responded differently to road distance. Dispersal distances changed little with distance from roads in non-edge contexts but increased in edge road-forest contexts (2x longer at 400 m than at 10 m) and showed a year x distance-to-road interaction, with longer dispersal distances farther from roads in the second year (a poor mast year). Dispersal distances were also longer when acorns were deposited under shrubs and in areas of higher tree density, and decreased with greater natural acorn availability. In contrast, the number of dispersal events declined with distance from roads (30% more events at 10 m than at 400 m) and was higher along unpaved than paved roads (39% more events). Dispersal frequency also increased in the poor mast year and with shrub cover. No acorns crossed the road. Thus, road verges can concentrate rodent seed handling but do not increase dispersal distances near roads nor provide cross-road seed connectivity; instead, dispersal outcomes depend on edge context, road type, and microhabitat structure. Management that retains structural cover at verges and the adjacent forest edge (e.g., shrub patches and non-uniform clearing) can harness verge-associated activity to increase acorn deposition in sheltered microsites and promote regeneration farther into forest interiors in roaded landscapes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.8%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
16
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%