Back

Plasmin-mediated cleavage of GPIbα contributes to breakdown of platelet-von Willebrand factor complexes

Frunt, R.; Moesker, E. I.; Sakai, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Huisman, A.; Tersteeg, C.; El Otmani, H.

2026-03-25 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.03.24.713874 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is an essential contributor to hemostasis through its interaction with the platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib receptor. VWF is cleaved by ADAMTS13 to limit its prothrombotic properties. Failure to do so can result in platelet-VWF complexes that occlude the microcirculation, as seen in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). In this setting, plasmin becomes active to cleave VWF, forming a distinct plasmin-generated cleavage product of VWF (cVWF) that is detectable during acute attacks in patients with TTP and following therapeutic plasminogen activation in a mouse model of TTP. However, it remains unclear whether plasmin-mediated proteolysis of VWF alone accounts for the breakdown of platelet-VWF complexes. Using ristocetin-induced platelet agglutinations, we show that plasmin cleavage of VWF does not impair its platelet-binding capacity, whereas plasmin-mediated cleavage of GPIb reduces the ability of platelets released from agglutinates to bind VWF. Furthermore, platelets in suspension are relatively resistant to plasmin cleavage. We therefore propose that VWF binding may enhance GPIb cleavage by recruiting plasmin(ogen) to the platelet surface. In a TTP mouse model, plasminogen activation led to a VWF-dependent reduction in GPIb detectability, although to a lesser extent than observed in vitro. In patients with acute TTP, soluble GPIb levels were elevated, indicating increased GPIb shedding during attacks of thrombotic microangiopathy, although the extent to which this is plasmin-mediated remains unclear. Together, our findings demonstrate that plasmin cleavage of GPIb drives the disruption of ristocetin-induced agglutinates, while its contribution to the breakdown of platelet-VWF complexes in vivo appears limited.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
6
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
21
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
25
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%